Sperm Produced In Laboratory In Doubt Scientists Confirm


A scientist in Newcastle claims to have created human sperm in the laboratory in what he says is a world first. The researcher believes the work could eventually help men with fertility problems to father a child. But other experts say they are not convinced that fully developed sperm have been created.

An expert writing in the journal Stem Cells and Development, the Newcastle team have yet to win over the scientific world. The reason being is due to the fact that the experiment has yet to be reproduced in front of a panel of experts. To date the only known experiment was completed behind closed doors. However, should they manage it; it would no doubt be one in the eye to the number of scientists willing to denounce the recent findings.

A flushed faced 70 year old scientist who claims to have produced a sizable supply of sperm confirmed it would be at least another hour before he could supply another sample and that would be pushing it.

Compulsive self abuser Ken Stott lambasted the alleged findings as yesterday’s news upon first hearing of the experiment. “I’ve been producing just as much in my own bedroom, bathroom and the local park for that matter, for some years now. To have so called scientists boast that they are the first to produce such an experiment is shameful to say the least and I denounce their claims.” Mr Stott we are informed is currently helping police with their enquiries of an alleged gulling incident at a nursing home.

Advertisements
Comments
5 Responses to “Sperm Produced In Laboratory In Doubt Scientists Confirm”
  1. "it would no doubt be one in the eye.." haha (and 'gulling' is..?)

  2. Nancy Friday says:

    if we can manufacture sperm, does this mean men are suprlus to requirements?

  3. Anonymous says:

    oh, so that's what gulling is… (just looked it up), yuck, just when i think men can't get any more revolting, they go and prove me wrong!

  4. hans kranker says:

    i am suprised the monkey face practice hasn't raised its head in this article

  5. i think it does mean men will not be of any further use in the future maybe that is why it has been rejected by top scientists (Ed.)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  • Archives

  • Submit your site to search engines This site is listed under Political Satire Directory
%d bloggers like this: